LymeNet Europe

Gee, I don't even have to listen to 23 minutes of that to know the answer. My question would be why the earlier publications of Steere and friends were more likely to tell the truth, but suddenly someone called "about face" and everything changed to the pack of lies they publish now. Why did this ha...

Thank you for coming back bluesdoc. Just before I read your last post, was about to say that all of the many patients who have gotten better with rife are hearsay and anecdotes. We will not know why they improved, and what the effect is on the human, not just the spirochetes, of these machines. I do...

People who hang around lyme forums and shoot down anything that helps and informs the subject and who do their best to hurt patients....are pyschopaths. There is no other reason for the behavior of two posters who are still here after a long time and who continue to misinform us. Why would they do t...

That roadback page link does not work. And I was wondering what the date was on the first one? We really need something that works on the herx, because for some people this is a serious concern and affects ability to treat.

No test for lyme is perfect, although some are better than others. What a good lyme doc does is go by history and symptoms, with test results for support but not the make or break on diagnosis. What that tells you is that you could spend that money, have a negative result, and still have lyme. If I ...

It certainly could be lyme, but you have such a strange history that other things could be involved instead, or too. See tropical medicine doc maybe for animal related diseases? Don't know what country you are in, which will make a difference with testing. Have you had no testing at all? Also, if yo...

Not sure you can blame salt C for the alcohol problem. It is always an issue with lyme, on all other treatments and without treatment.

Sorry, don't know what you do about this now. But thanks for posting the warning. People try all sorts of things, out of desperation.

Gives me the creeps to watch these things swim around.

If a layperson can do this, it can be done. So, why isn't it being done?

Then who exactly does this include? No one with any real decline apparently. I guess they are figuring people won't read the exclusion criteria and just read the title, then use it against us. These people are crooks. Not that we hadn't figured this out before. Shameless crooks.

I have always said the NIH intramural study of lyme was bogus, never would produce anything useful or honest. This confirms my opinion. And I know one of those patients who would definitely say this paper's conclusions were not true for her. Marques saw which way the wind was blowing and made sure t...