MacDonald Publishes His proof of biofilms dwelling Inside of Alzheimer's Amyloid Plaques with FISH/Amyloid double stain

Medical topics with questions, information and discussion related to Lyme disease and other tick-borne diseases.
Post Reply
User avatar
inmacdonald
Posts: 977
Joined: Fri 13 Jan 2012 22:32

MacDonald Publishes His proof of biofilms dwelling Inside of Alzheimer's Amyloid Plaques with FISH/Amyloid double stain

Post by inmacdonald » Sun 19 Jun 2016 23:55

Priority of Publication with Copyright(C) 2015
by Alan B. MacDonald, MD
on August 26, 2015

http://www.F1000research.com/posters/4-631

DOI: 10.7490/f1000research.11103565.1

"Dual Staining of Alzheimer's Plaques: Amyloid stains/DNA probe for Borrelia FISH method [DNA Hybridization]

Copyright (C) 2015, All rights Reserved, by Alan B. MacDonald, MD

Full citation and Poster:
Link: via
http://www.f1000research.com/posters/4-631
Link : Via DOI:
10.7490/f1000research.11103565.1



Alan B. MacDonald, MD, FCAP
June 19, 2016
Naples, Florida, 34114-2754

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed 25 Jul 2007 21:06

Re: MacDonald Publishes His proof of biofilms dwelling Inside of Alzheimer's Amyloid Plaques with FISH/Amyloid double st

Post by admin » Mon 20 Jun 2016 0:31

I see a research poster, but where is the published study?

User avatar
inmacdonald
Posts: 977
Joined: Fri 13 Jan 2012 22:32

Re: MacDonald Publishes His proof of biofilms dwelling Inside of Alzheimer's Amyloid Plaques with FISH/Amyloid double st

Post by inmacdonald » Mon 20 Jun 2016 1:05

Published = indexed by DOI number
The F1000 research site passes the Publication to
The DOI web indexing service

When a formal DOI indexing number is assigned,
The work is officially Published.

DOI: 10.7940/f1000research.1113565.1

If a Creative Commons Copyright is established, as it is for my published work
The work has equal status with ant other work also referenced with a unique DOI number

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed 25 Jul 2007 21:06

Re: MacDonald Publishes His proof of biofilms dwelling Inside of Alzheimer's Amyloid Plaques with FISH/Amyloid double st

Post by admin » Tue 21 Jun 2016 14:54

inmacdonald wrote:Published = indexed by DOI number
The F1000 research site passes the Publication to
The DOI web indexing service

When a formal DOI indexing number is assigned,
The work is officially Published.

DOI: 10.7940/f1000research.1113565.1

If a Creative Commons Copyright is established, as it is for my published work
The work has equal status with ant other work also referenced with a unique DOI number
I had send an e-mail to F1000Research with questions regarding all this, and these are the answers I got:
F1000Research wrote:Please find below the responses to your questions:

1. No posters do not have equal status to published studies (see question 2 for why)
2. No they do not count as published scientific literature as they do not undergo peer review.
3. No assigning a DOI does not give a poster or a published study a higher status, DOIs are assigned to provide a persistent link to its location on the internet. See here for more info: http://www.apastyle.org/learn/faqs/what-is-doi.aspx
4. No a Creative Commons Copyright does not give posters or published studies a higher status. A Creative Commons Copyright is just the means by which research is published as 'Open Access' and means it can be viewed and re used (as long as it's properly cited) by anyone.
So, your poster does not count as, nor does it have equal status as, a published study. Therefore I will move this topic from "Published Studies" to "Medical Topics".

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed 25 Jul 2007 21:06

Re: MacDonald Publishes His proof of biofilms dwelling Inside of Alzheimer's Amyloid Plaques with FISH/Amyloid double st

Post by admin » Tue 21 Jun 2016 14:58

Moved topic from "Published Studies" to "Medical Topics" for reasons mentioned in the previous post.

lou
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri 2 Nov 2007 0:41

Re: MacDonald Publishes His proof of biofilms dwelling Inside of Alzheimer's Amyloid Plaques with FISH/Amyloid double st

Post by lou » Wed 29 Jun 2016 23:01

Yes, the content of such material is certainly less important than getting it in the correct forum. I salute your values.

Post Reply