Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

General or non-medical topics with information and discussion related to Lyme disease and other tick-borne diseases.
User avatar
Spanky
Posts: 2762
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008 19:40

Re: Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

Post by Spanky » Tue 27 Dec 2011 17:41

Carina:
Compare that with what I said! I did not say what Henry claim, that I said!
Okay?

Well, where was it found, then?

Why don't you clarify it, instead of just bickering with Henry over words?

tosho
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 0:54
Location: Poland

Re: Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

Post by tosho » Tue 27 Dec 2011 17:42

Spanky wrote:"tosho":
Leaving a patient with active infections and misleading him/her that 4 weeks of treatment was enough is inhumane and immoral.

There is that word "immoral", again...
Because misleading patients with active infections is immoral.

Henry: no you are wrong, you would stop "singing your tune" quickly if you were first - misdiagnosed and second - mistreated for years and your life destroyed by this illness.

X-member
Posts: 6888
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 18:18

Re: Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

Post by X-member » Tue 27 Dec 2011 17:44

And, now Spanky start to give us a lot of posts, that confuse us even more! :?

I understand the word "immoral" (that Tosho used) perfectly!

X-member
Posts: 6888
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 18:18

Re: Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

Post by X-member » Tue 27 Dec 2011 17:45

Spanky, you wrote:
Okay?

Well, where was it found, then?

Why don't you clarify it, instead of just bickering with Henry over words?
What is the problem with you and Henry??

Can you not read??

Check my earlier posts, and you will find my answer!

User avatar
Spanky
Posts: 2762
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008 19:40

Re: Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

Post by Spanky » Tue 27 Dec 2011 17:48

"tosho":
Because misleading patients with active infections is immoral.
Well, to whom does this apply then, Tosho?

And how do they do this? I assume you mean they're not just mistaken, right?

You mean that you think people are really trying to deny people necessary treatment...INTENTIONALLY?

Isn't what you really mean that Tosho thinks people who don't see things quite the way Tosho does are "immoral"?
Last edited by Spanky on Tue 27 Dec 2011 17:55, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Spanky
Posts: 2762
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008 19:40

Re: Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

Post by Spanky » Tue 27 Dec 2011 17:52

"Carina":
Can you not read??
Well, as you were so kind to point out to me earlier, my English is probably just not as good as yours.

I was asking for help in undertsanding what YOU are saying.

Henry said that he thought you had said it was found in the red cells. You respond by saying that's not right. But your quote clearly says 'blood".

So, my question simply is, okay: where within the blood was it found?
Check my earlier posts, and you will find my answer!
Carina, I am doing you the courtesy of caring enough to ask you to explain. I would appreciate the courtesy of a reply.

X-member
Posts: 6888
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 18:18

Re: Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

Post by X-member » Tue 27 Dec 2011 17:57

Spanky, Henry can instead read what I have said, and not claim that I have said something else!

And I have answered Henrys question!

tosho
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 0:54
Location: Poland

Re: Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

Post by tosho » Tue 27 Dec 2011 18:00

Spanky wrote:Well, who does this apply to then, Tosho?
In a first line? To those who create guidelines.

Spanky wrote:And how do they do this? I assume you mean they're not just mistaken, right?
You mean that you think people are really trying to deny people necessary treatment...INTENTIONALLY?
How can I tell you the exact reasons?
For a reasonable thinking person it is unacceptable to see over and over again the same stories of people that were failed and abandoned by medicine in a field of tickborne diseases.
Spanky wrote:Isn't what you really mean that Tosho thinks people who don't see things quite the way Tosho does are "immoral"?
Not only tosho, but quite a lot of other people too.
I would love to cooperate with infectious diseases doctors, but first they should do the step forward and stop denying things (actually year by year it is getting better, but still not to enough degree).

User avatar
Spanky
Posts: 2762
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008 19:40

Re: Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

Post by Spanky » Tue 27 Dec 2011 18:00

"Carina":
And I have answered Henrys question!
Well, what about MY question, though?

Again...I am asking, if not the red cells, where in the blood were these things found, PLEASE?

X-member
Posts: 6888
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 18:18

Re: Christopher Smith's Lyme Disease Bill 2557

Post by X-member » Tue 27 Dec 2011 18:02

Spanky, since I already have answered the question (in an earlier post), I don't have to answer it again!

But you can look at my profile image, that is from my blood if you like! :D

Post Reply