Those are their OPINIONS, Tosho.In a first line? To those who create guidelines.
And the fact is...that those opinions are supported by the best scientific evidence available. They are backed up by controlled studies.
Do you mean that they are not entitled to interpret the evidence and express their interpretations of it without consulting Tosho as to the morality of it all?
So, a 'reasonable' person can see this 'failure'...and blame the people that are studying the illness...instead of the nature of the illness itself?How can I tell you the exact reasons?
For a reasonable thinking person it is unacceptable to see over and over again the same stories of people that were failed and abandoned by medicine in a field of tickborne diseases.
And you label this: "reasonable"?
Again...and for the umpteenth time, Tosho, no one is denying that some people continue to experience symptoms following conventional treatment.
They just disagree over what the cause is. And I really don't see how a scientific dispute becomes "immoral" in your eyes. (And I wish you would be more careful with that word, please. You do understand that its use suggests impure motives, do you not? I think we have all heard more than enough of that kind of talk).
Well, I am asking Tosho, though. And, are you familiar with the logical fallacy that is often called "Twenty million Frenchmen can't be wrong"?Not only tosho, but quite a lot of other people too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
PS. I remember the origin of this, though, coming from ads about a type of perfume used, with the "twenty million Frenchmen can't be wrong" slogan attached. But, I could be wrong..."Fifty million Frenchmen can't be wrong" is used, though often sarcastically, to justify a point of view by alluding to its general acceptance. It is a demonstration of argumentum ad populum and is falsified prima facie by the French obsession with Jerry Lewis as a comic genius in the 1960s.